The Enid News and Eagle, Enid, OK

Opinion

March 25, 2008

Court record ruling seems beneficial for Oklahomans

It’s good to see the Oklahoma Supreme Court has come to its senses regarding restricting public access to court records.

The court reversed its order that would have restricted online access to public court records. The reversal was supported by free-speech advocates, journalists, law enforcement court clerks and businesses.

The reversal of this ruling goes to show how effective public concern and criticism can be in stopping a bad rule or a bad law.

The new rules were intended to prevent identity theft from people who have online access to court records. The rules would also have required Social Security numbers, birth dates and addresses be excluded from public documents.

The negative reaction to this ruling was swift and immediate. There are important and compelling reasons why this information should remain in the court documents that are available online.

First and foremost is the importance of providing more information online, not less. This ruling would have been a sweeping reversal of the trend to provide more public records and information for online access. It would have been a giant leap backward in providing access to the public.

Second is the need for many users of such court documents to have access to identifier information, primarily birth dates. We can understand restricting access to Social Security numbers, but taking out birth date information could have led to people being misidentified for public information purposes.

This reversal by the court is good news for the taxpayers of Oklahoma. It appears the court did not fully realize or understand the overwhelming use of these records by all citizens of Oklahoma.

At one point, the court had recommended a task force to work on limiting the risks of identity theft due to these records. Though there was no mention of that during the court’s reversal, we think it would be a good idea to pursue. This is what should have happened in the first place instead of a sweeping closure of online records.

The taxpayers of Oklahoma have won in this case, and we applaud the Oklahoma Supreme Court for finally doing the right thing.

Text Only
Opinion
Featured Ads
AP Video
Killer of Fla. Girl Found in Landfill Gets Life Army Orders Bradley Manning Court-martial Cancer Charity Revives Breast-screening Grants Heavy Snowstorm Hits Colorado On Its Way East 2nd Teacher From LA School Arrested on Sex Claim Prosecutors Close Armstrong Inquiry, No Charges Sights and Sounds: Football Fans Pour Into Indy Unemployment Rate Down to 8.3% Obama: Still Far Too Many Americans Need Jobs GOP: Jobs Numbers Welcome, Can Do Better Fla. Man Adopts Girlfriend in Legal Battle More Deaths As Egypt Clashes Continue Raw Video: Prince William in Falklands Egpyt Protesters Blame Police for Soccer Deaths 'Lucky' 9-Year-Old Receives 6-Organ Transplant Raw Video: Michelle Vs. Ellen in Pushup Contest First Person: Will Peyton Manning Stay in Indy? Egypt Shaken After Deadly Soccer Riot New Suits, New Starts for New York's Unemployed Hall of Famer Dorsett Speaks Out on NFL Injuries
NDN Video
SB XLVI: Adam Sandler Bronx Zoo Selling Valentine's Day Roaches Adam Levine: Shame on Randy Jackson Tim Tebow Addresses His Fans and Faith Gossip Girl's Steamy Spread AG Holder defends actions in heated hearing 'Lucky' 9-Year-Old Receives 6-Organ Transplant First Look: Kim Kardashian on 'Last Man Standing' Panetta said to expect Israel attack on Iran in spring Madonna channels Victor Cruz Christina Hendricks Stuns in Sexy Dress Raw Video: Snow Causes 20-Car Pileup in Italy Raw Video: Michelle Vs. Ellen in Pushup Contest College Football Prospect Chooses Team Based on Chick-Fil-A EXCLUSIVE: Katy Perry's Sims 3 Commercial BTS Ads get social at Super Bowl NY Police Shoot Dead Unarmed Man Man Adopts 42-Year-Old Girlfriend Kim Kardashian Looking to Start Bible Study Group Raw Video: Punxsutawney Phil Sees Shadow
Seasonal Content
House Ads